Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of documentary practice on the construction and modernisation of the national archival system and to assess its effectiveness in preserving cultural heritage. The study examined the countries of Central Europe and the role of archival studies in the establishment and development of national archives. The methodology included a comparative analysis of archival practices in three countries of the region, namely Poland, Slovakia, and Hungary, focusing on institutional strategies, technological innovations, and archival policy. The survey was conducted from August 2023 to September 2024 and covered 250 respondents, including 32% of archives managers, 36% of archivists, and 32% of administrative staff. This study analysed the significance of archives in preserving national heritage, the effectiveness of modern technologies, and the organisation of management processes. Statistical analysis of the data showed that 78% of respondents believe that digitisation is necessary to improve the accessibility of archival materials. Furthermore, 85% of the participants confirmed the need for ethical archival management and stressed the value of adhering to ethical standards when working with documents. This study also revealed the need to integrate document research into archival practice to improve the management of archival materials. The findings demonstrated that effective digitisation strategies can greatly improve access to archival resources and facilitate research. The findings also highlighted the crucial role of archives in preserving national heritage and the need to modernise archival systems to improve records management. The study found that although Poland, Slovakia, and Hungary have distinct institutional strategies and technological innovations, all three countries aspire to improve archival policy through the introduction of modern technologies. The study confirmed that the effective implementation of innovations such as digitisation and improved management of archival resources contributes to the preservation of national heritage
Keywords
technological innovation; digitalisation; financing; ethical standards; cultural heritage; legal regulation
References
[1] Agostinho, D. (2019). Archival encounters: Rethinking access and care in digital colonial archives. Archival Science, 19, 141-165. doi: 10.1007/s10502-019-09312-0.
[2] Anderson, N. (2021). Hauntology: The archive as past and future. In J. Potts (Ed.), Use and reuse of the digital archive (pp. 105-113). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-79523-8_7.
[3] Batzeli, A. (2024). Teaching with Archives Portal Europe: The portal and its usability in history education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380402734_Teaching_with_Archives_Portal_Europe_the_Portal_and_its_usability_in_History_Education.
[4] Ben-David, A. (2021). Critical web archive research. In D. Gomes, E. Demidova, J. Winters & T. Risse (Eds.), The past web (pp. 181-188). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63291-5_14.
[5] Bingham, N.J., & Byrne, H. (2021). Archival strategies for contemporary collecting in a world of big data: Challenges and opportunities with curating the UK web archive. Big Data & Society, 8(1). doi: 10.1177/2053951721990409.
[6] Bochenska, A., Kot, P., Muradov, M., Markiewicz, J., Zawieska, D., Hess, M., & Antoniou, A. (2023). Critical evaluation of cultural heritage architectural standard documentation methods across different European countries. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 48, 251-258. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-251-2023.
[7] Callahan, S. (2022). Art+ Archive: Understanding the archival turn in contemporary art. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
[8] Campanotti, B. (2021). Archive and preservation. In C. Smith & C. Lennon (Eds.), The media workflow puzzle: How it all fits together (pp. 175-218). New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781351189552.
[9] Carbajal, I.A., & Caswell, M. (2021). Critical digital archives: A review from archival studies. The American Historical Review, 126(3), 1102-1120. doi: 10.1093/ahr/rhab359.
[10] Caswell, M. (2021). Urgent archives: Enacting liberatory memory work. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003001355.
[11] Centre of Community Archives. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://cas.org.pl/centre-of-community-archives/.
[12] Colavizza, G., Blanke, T., Jeurgens, C., & Noordegraaf, J. (2021). Archives and AI: An overview of current debates and future perspectives. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(1), article number 4. doi: 10.1145/3479010.
[13] Daga, E., et al. (2022). Integrating citizen experiences in cultural heritage archives: Requirements, state of the art, and challenges. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(1), article number 11. doi: 10.1145/3477599.
[14] Fenner, M. (2023). Archiving individual science blog posts. Retrieved from https://blog.front-matter.io/posts/archiving-individual-science-blog-posts/.
[15] Friedewald, M., Székely, I., & Karaboga, M. (2024). Preserving the past, enabling the future: Assessing the European policy on access to archives in the digital age. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, 53(2), 61-71. doi: 10.1515/pdtc-2024-0003.
[16] Ganesh, S.S., & Gauri, S. (2024). Digital fever: Reflections of a Queer Archive. In M. Dodd & N. Menon (Eds.), Practices of digital humanities in India: Learning by doing (pp. 222-236). London: Routledge India. doi: 10.4324/9781003325239.
[17] Guidance note of the European Commission on ethics and data protection. (2021). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ethics-and-data-protection_he_en.pdf.
[18] Harkin, N. (2020). Weaving the colonial archive: A basket to lighten the load. Journal of Australian Studies, 44(2), 154-166. doi: 10.1080/14443058.2020.1754276.
[19] Hawkins, A. (2022). Archives, linked data and the digital humanities: Increasing access to digitised and born-digital archives via the semantic web. Archival Science, 22, 319-344. doi: 10.1007/s10502-021-09381-0.
[20] Jaillant, L., & Rees, A. (2023). Applying AI to digital archives: Trust, collaboration and shared professional ethics. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38(2), 571-585. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqac073.
[21] Jo, E.S., & Gebru, T. (2020). Lessons from archives: Strategies for collecting sociocultural data in machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 306-316). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/3351095.3372829.
[22] Li, K.K., & Chiu, D.K.W. (2022). A worldwide quantitative review of the iSchools’ archival education. Library Hi Tech, 40(5), 1497-1518. doi: 10.1108/LHT-09-2021-0311.
[23] Liew, C.L., & Lipscombe, A. (2024). Communities, conversations, & care: A new model of archiving. Information Matters, 4(2). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4732876.
[24] Manoff, M. (2019). Archive and library. Retrieved from https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:22309/.
[25] Marciano, R., Lemieux, V., Hedges, M., Esteva, M., Underwood, W., Kurtz, M., & Conrad, M. (2018). Archival records and training in the age of big data. In J. Percell, L.C. Sarin, P.T. Jaeger & J.C. Bertot (Eds.), Re-envisioning the MLS: Perspectives on the future of library and information science education (pp. 179-199). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited. doi: 10.1108/S0065-28302018000044B010.
[26] Mayrl, D., & Wilson, N.H. (2020). The archive as a social world. Qualitative Sociology, 43, 407-426. doi: 10.1007/s11133-020-09462-z.
[27] Odumosu, T. (2020). The crying child: On colonial archives, digitization, and ethics of care in the cultural commons. Current Anthropology, 61(22), 289-302. doi: 10.1086/710062.
[28] Ogden, J. (2022). Everything on the internet can be saved: Archive Team, Tumblr and the cultural significance of web archiving. Internet Histories, 6(1-2), 113-132. doi: 10.1080/24701475.2021.1985835.
[29] Paalman, F., Fossati, G., & Masson, E. (2021). Introduction: Activating the archive. The Moving Image, 21(1&2). doi: 10.5749/movingimage.21.1-2.0001.
[30] Peirson-Smith, A., & Peirson-Smith, B. (2020). Fashion archive fervour: The critical role of fashion archives in preserving, curating, and narrating fashion. Archives and Records, 41(3), 274-298. doi: 10.1080/23257962.2020.1813556.
[31] Pickett, J., & Sartori, P. (2019). From the archetypical archive to cultures of documentation. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 62(5-6), 773-798. doi: 10.1163/15685209-12341493.
[32] Rydén, R. (2019). Archivists and time: Conceptions of time and long-term information preservation among archivists. Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies, 6, article number 6.
[33] Steglich, S. (2021). The archive as chronotopos in the nineteenth century: Toward a history of archival times. History and Theory, 60(2), 234-248. doi: 10.1111/hith.12204.
[34] Subotić, J. (2021). Ethics of archival research on political violence. Journal of Peace Research, 58(3), 342-354. doi: 10.1177/0022343319898735.
[35] Tennent, K.D., & Gillett, A.G. (2023). How to research in an archive. In S. Decker, W.M. Foster & E. Giovannoni (Eds.), Handbook of historical methods for management (pp. 104-120). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781800883741.00016.
[36] Wright, K. (2022). Archival interventions and the language we use. In V. Frings-Hessami & F. Foscarini (Eds.), Archives in a changing climate (pp. 123-140). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-19289-0_8.
