Abstract
Russian aggression, which has been ongoing since 2014, has led to the deaths of both military and civilian citizens of Ukraine. For this reason, the perpetuation of the memory about the fallen in the Russian-Ukrainian war at the present stage of historical development is an important tool for shaping the future generations’ historical memory. The purpose of the study was to provide a comprehensive and holistic analysis of the peculiarities of constructing Ukraine’s public space by preserving the memory of the fallen in the Russian-Ukrainian war. The research was conducted on the basis of a wide range of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, objectivity) and special methods that allowed to analyse the policy and practices of commemorating the memory of the fallen during the Russian-Ukrainian war. The research results indicated that in the period from 2014-2021, the public space was dominated mainly by the practices of commemorating military personnel and individual cases of civilians. It is noted that a significant number of memorial sites after the large-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia were occupied or in the combat zone, and therefore are probably destroyed and will no longer perform its main function of preserving the memory of the Russian-Ukrainian war. After the large-scale Russian invasion, there is a certain spontaneity in the commemoration of the fallen soldiers and civilians in the Russian-Ukrainian war, especially in the public space. It had been found that the public space practically does not reflect the genocidal dimension of the war, associated with massive Russian missile attacks on civilians, as well as the ways of commemorating the tortured Ukrainian citizens in the discovered torture chambers in the de-occupied territories. The research results are applied in nature, as they can be used by central and local government authorities to make adjustments to the current memory policy and launch a new series of fundamental researches related to the development of a new concept for perpetuating the memory of victims of the genocidal Russian-Ukrainian war
Keywords
memorialisation; national identity; civic consciousness; civic initiatives; memory policy
References
1. A memorial sign was opened in Kharkiv to the victims of the explosion during a peaceful march last year. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/news/27567530.html
2. Azaryahu, M. (2020). Name-making as place-making. In Naming, identity and tourism (pp. 11-28). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
3. Baranivska, T. (2023). In Irpen, a sculpture was installed and a mural was unveiled for Independence Day. Retrieved from https://suspilne.media/kyiv/557771-v-irpeni-do-dna-nezaleznosti-vstanovili-skulpturu-i-vidkrili-mural/
4. Bohdanyok, O. (2024). 538 children died in Ukraine as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation – OGPU. Retrieved from https://suspilne.media/719702-538-ditej-zaginuli-v-ukraini-vnaslidok-zbrojnoi-agresii-rf-ogpu/
5. Book of memory of those who died for Ukraine. (2024). Retrieved from https://memorybook.org.ua/14/karachevsky.htm
6. Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 37-p “On Measures to Perpetuate the Memory of The Defenders of Ukraine for the Period until 2025”. (2021, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/37-2021-%D1%80#Text.
7. Gabowitsch, М. (2023). Monuments in times of war. Retrieved from https://www.eurozine.com/monuments-in-times-of-war/?pdf
8. Gironi, C. (2022). Decolonizing Kyiv’s politics of memory: current and potential implications of Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine on Ukrainian monuments and toponyms. The Journal of International Relations, Peace Studies, and Development, 8(1), article number 6.
9. Glew, А. (2021). Path dependent: Positioning Ukrainian war memorials in a post-Soviet landscape. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 63(1-2), 229-247. doi: 10.1080/00085006.2021.1915525.
10. Halbwachs, M. (2020). Space and the collective memory. In The collective memory (pp. 1-15). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. In Lviv, they want to erect a monument to volunteers who help Ukrainian defenders. (2021). Retrieved from https://zahid.espreso.tv/u-lvovi-khochut-vstanoviti-pamyatnik-volonteram-yaki-dopomagayut-ukrainskim-zakhisnikam
12. Ivanenko, V., & Kryvoshein, V. (2022). State policy of memory in modern Ukraine in the conditions of information war (2014-2021). Grani, 25(2), 16-21. doi: 10.15421/172218.
13. Klochko, D. (2023). Lawn of national memory. Retrieved from https://tyzhden.ua/hazon-natsionalnoi-pam-iati/
14. Konyk, A. (2020). War memorials and war memorials. https://otak.news/publications/society/pamiatni-znaky-pro-viinu-ta-viina-z-pamiatnykamy
15. Koshelev, M. (2017). Bloody annexation without “a single shot”. Retrieved from https://hromadske.ua/posts/richnicya-aneksii-krimu.
16. Kotsur, L., & Zinkevich, Ya. (2024). The policy of perpetuating the memory of fallen soldiers-medics during the Russian-Ukrainian war 2014-2022. In Science and education of Ukraine in the conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian war: Challenges and tasks in the context of national security (pp. 80-85). Odesa: Publishing house “Helvetyka”.
17. Kyrydon, A. (2020). Issues of historical memory and commemorative practices. Historical Memory, 1(42), 7-19.
18. Law of Ukraine No. 2292-IX “On Amendments to Certain Laws of Ukraine Regarding the National Military Memorial Cemetery”. (2022, May). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2292-20#Text.
19. Martsenyuk, T., Ivantsiv, O., & Osmak, V. (2021). What it is to remember: Policies and practices of commemorating fallen soldiers in the Russian-Ukrainian war in eastern Ukraine. Retrieved from https://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/a0ee9c30-e142-4208-bdd3-b63d70bfb112/content.
20. Masnenko, V., & Prysiazhniuk, Yu. (2024). Formation of the modern Ukrainian tradition of honorary titles of military formations. Ukrainian Historical Journal, 1(574), 5-28.
21. Methodological recommendations for local communities regarding the preservation and commemoration of the participants, victims and events of the Russian-Ukrainian war. (2024).. Retrieved from https://uinp.gov.ua/elektronni-vydannya/metodychni-rekomendaciyi-dlya-miscevyh-gromad-shchodo-zberezhennya-i-vshanuvannya-pamyati-uchasnykiv-zhertv-i-podiy-rosiysko-ukrayinskoyi-viyny
22. Nabok, S. (2018). Images of war and the warrior: The transformation of certain aspects of the politics of memory. Collections of Scholarly Articles, 5-6, 197-228.
23. Nosova, H. (2021). Pierre Nora’s concept of contrasting memory and history. International Journal of Philosophy, 9(4), 216-220. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20210904.16.
24. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1115 “On the Establishment of the State Institution “National Military Memorial Cemetery”. (2022, October). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1115-2022-%D0%BF#Text.
25. Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine No. 1490-IX “On Honoring the Memory of Children Who Died as a Result of the Armed Aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine”. (2021, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1490-20#Text.
26. Rose-Redwood R., Alderman D., & Azaryahu, M. (2017). The urban streetscape as political cosmos. In The political life of urban streetscapes (pp. 1-24). London: Taylor & Francis Group. doi: 10.4324/9781315554464-1.
27. Russian torture centers in Ukraine work as a single mechanism: Investigation by international investigators (2023). Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/news-64795431
28. Rybalska, A. (2023). A memorial to medics who died during the war was opened in Kyiv. Retrieved from https://suspilne.media/538033-u-kievi-vidkrili-memorial-medikam-aki-zaginuli-pid-cas-vijni/.
29. Schwartz, B. (2015). Commemoration. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10404-0.
30. Shanken, A. (2022). The everyday life of memorials. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
31. The book of memory of the fallen for Ukraine. (2024). Retrieved from https://memorybook.org.ua/14/karachevsky.htm.
32. The National Military Memorial Cemetery received land plots for permanent use for the construction of the NVMK. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/natsionalne-viiskove-memorialne-kladovyshche-otrymalo-v-postiine-korystuvannia-zemelni-dilianky-dlia-budivnytstva-nvmk.
33. The Prosecutor General told how many Russian torture chambers were discovered in the liberated territories. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.slovoidilo.ua/2023/12/07/novyna/bezpeka/henprokuror-rozpoviv-skilky-rosijskyx-kativen-vyyavyly-zvilnenyx-terytoriyax
34. The sixth anniversary of the beginning of the anti-terrorist operation: figures and facts. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.slovoidilo.ua/2020/04/14/infografika/bezpeka/shosta-richnycya-pochatku-ato-cyfry-fakty.
35. The stele “Hero Cities of Ukraine” was unveiled in Kamianets-Podilskyi. (2022). Ukrinform. Retrieved from https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-regions/3488788-u-kamancipodilskomu-vidkrili-stelu-mistageroi-ukraini.html
36. Torture. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.ukrinform.ua/tag-katuvanna?page=3.
37. Virtual museum of Russian aggression (2024). Retrieved from https://rusaggression.gov.ua/ua/events.html#events-2014
38. Yablonskyi, V., & Lozovyi, V., Valevskyi, O., Zdioruk, S., & Zubchenko, S. (2019). The policy of historical memory in the context of national security of Ukraine. Kyiv: NISD.
39. Zubar, M. (2024). The voids of Mariupol’s memory. Text and Image Essential Problems in Art History, 2(16), 103-120. doi: 10.17721/2519-4801.2023.2.07.
