ISSN 2518-7600 e-ISSN 2524-1060 UDC 90,92,93/94
Submit an article

Society. Document. Communication

Article

Émigré media as a tool for transnational political influence: Communication mechanisms and models of elite responses in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

Manchuk Mukasheva, Rizagul Bakenova, Assel Alim, Nurlan Nuraliev, Aalybek Akunov
Retrieved from Volume 11, No. 2, 2026 Pages 116–135
Received
20.12.2025
Revised
13.04.2026
Accepted
12.05.2026
Published
30.05.2026
Views
61

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine émigré media as a documentary and communication system through which information about political influence is recorded, preserved, verified, transmitted and re-circulated across national borders. The research combined source-based documentary analysis, archival reconstruction, digital-source verification and qualitative content analysis of émigré periodicals, Azattyk/Azattyq publications, international resolutions, human-rights reports, legal documents and statistical materials relating to Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Particular attention was paid to methods of documenting emigrant content, including the fixation of testimonies, publication metadata, screenshots and web archives, cross-platform preservation of digital traces, and comparison of media messages with official statements and institutional reactions. It was established that émigré media function as a transnational documentary infrastructure rather than only as political actors: they accumulate alternative evidence, preserve counter-narratives, and transmit them through international, transnational and domestic communication circuits. The study analysed narrative framing, multiplatform dissemination and wave documentation as independent communication strategies, not merely as auxiliary instruments for achieving political outcomes. The findings show that elite responses followed differentiated models: adaptive authoritarianism in Kazakhstan and repressive resistance in Kyrgyzstan. The practical significance of the study lies in its application to archival work, particularly for the description, preservation, verification and long-term accessibility of émigré media collections and digital evidence produced under conditions of political pressure

Keywords

émigré journalism; diasporic media platforms; documentary communication; source verification; digital preservation

References

  1. Abramson, Y. (2024). Securitizing the nation beyond the state: Diasporas as threats, victims, and assets. European Journal of International Relations, 30(1), 78-103. doi: 10.1177/13540661221151036.
  2. Adamson, F.B., & Han, E. (2024). Diasporic geopolitics, rising powers, and the future of international order. Review of International Studies, 50(3), 476-493. doi: 10.1017/S0260210524000123.
  3. Aktailakova, A. (2025). “It has become extremely difficult for us”: Uncertain future for RFE/RL’s Kazakh service. Retrieved from https://cpj.org/2025/08/it-has-become-extremely-difficult-for-us-uncertain-future-for-rfe-rls-kazakh-service/.
  4. Al Jazeera. (2022). Kazakh President Tokayev promises reform after referendum win. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/6/6/kazakhstan-votes-to-amend-constitution-referendum-results.
  5. Allworth, E., Carrkre d’Encausse, H., Matley, I., Menges, K., Spector, J., & Sprague, A. (1967). Central Asia: A century of Russian rule. New York: Columbia University Press.
  6. Arafat, R. (2021). Examining diaspora journalists’ digital networks and role perceptions: A case study of Syrian post-conflict advocacy journalism. Journalism Studies, 22(16), 2174-2196. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2021.1990110.
  7. Associated Press. (2023). Kyrgyz government seeking to shut down radio station. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/technology-tajikistan-kyrgyzstan-c9c0e64245d6a7b1953393c86484825a.
  8. Babayev, F.F. (2024). The impact of the government information policy on effective state administration. Scientific Work, 18(3), 75-79. doi: 10.36719/2663-4619/100/75-79.
  9. Baser, B., & Féron, É. (2022). Host state reactions to home state diaspora engagement policies: Rethinking state sovereignty and limits of diaspora governance. Global Networks, 22(2), 226-241. doi: 10.1111/glob.12341.
  10. Bayimbetov, B. (2023). Mass media’s role in political and social transformation in post-Soviet Central Asia. In E. Turdubaeva & E. Papoutsaki (Eds.), Mapping the media and communication landscape of Central Asia: An anthology of emerging and contemporary issues (pp. 105-125). London: Lexington Books.
  11. Bhandari, N.B. (2021). Diaspora and cultural identity: A conceptual review. Journal of Political Science, 21, 100-108. doi: 10.3126/jps.v21i0.35268.
  12. Bhat, R.M., & Rajeshwari, R. (2022). Diasporic culture and international relations – a historical study. International Conference on Health Science, Green Economics, Educational Review and Technology, 4, 41-46. doi: 10.54443/ihert.v4i.131.
  13. Birbayeva, A. (2025). Kazakh audience turns to social media as primary news source, study finds. Retrieved from https://astanatimes.com/2025/07/kazakh-audience-turns-to-social-media-as-primary-news-source-study-finds/.
  14. Bird, L. (2023). Motivations of diaspora support in homeland civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 60(2), 226-242. doi: 10.1177/00223433211064795.
  15. Blom, M. (2024). Conflicting frames: A comparative analysis of general and diasporic media framing of violent conflict in the diaspora’s homeland. (Master’s thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden).
  16. Blunt, A., & Dowling, R. (2022). Home, migration, and diaspora. In Home (pp. 247-308). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429327360-6.
  17. Bond, R. (2022). Migrants’ associations with their “homelands”: Transnationalism, diaspora and development. In Understanding international migration: Social, cultural and historical contexts (pp. 75-99). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-16463-7_4.
  18. Carment, D., MacIsaac, S., Nikolko, M., & Belo, D. (2022). Diaspora networks, fragile states: Conflict and cooperation. In L. Kennedy (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of diaspora diplomacy (pp. 255-271). New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003031468-24.
  19. Chekirova, A. (2022). Social media and cross-border political participation: Case study of Kyrgyz migrants’ online activism. Social Sciences, 11(8), article number 370. doi: 10.3390/socsci11080370.
  20. Chekirova, A. (2024). Kyrgyz diaspora online: Understanding transnational political participation. In A.-L. Heusala, K. Aitamurto & S. Eraliev (Eds.), Global migration and illiberalism in Russia, Eurasia, and Eastern Europe (pp. 189-218). Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. doi: 10.33134/HUP-26-6.
  21. Chirvas, C. (2022). Models of interaction between the state of origin and the diaspora. Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies, 8(2), 6-17. doi: 10.53486/2537-6179.8-2.01.
  22. Committee to Protect Journalists. (2024). Kyrgyzstan parliament approves “foreign agents” law. Retrieved from https://cpj.org/2024/03/kyrgyzstan-parliament-approves-foreign-agents-law/.
  23. Cornell, S.E. (2024). Two years later: Kazakhstan’s January events. Retrieved from https://www.cacianalyst.org/resources/240102_FT_KazJan.pdf.
  24. Dodds, T., Arafat, R., & Yeung, W.N. (2024). Bound by exile: Exploring kinship dynamics and role perceptions among diaspora journalists. Journal of Media Ethics. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2024.2366344.
  25. Dogalov, A., Kairanbekov, B., & Dosmaganbetov, H. (2023). Mustafa Shokay about collectivization in Kazakhstan and the republic of Media Asia. Economic Series of the Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov ENU, 3, 18-24.
  26. European Parliament Resolution No. 2022/2505(RSP) “On the Situation in Kazakhstan”. (2022, January). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0012_EN.html
  27. Fabos, A.H., Kahn, L., & Sarkis, M. (2021). Moving stories: Methodological challenges to mapping narratives and networks of people in diasporas. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(3), 2554-2567. doi: 10.1093/jrs/feab072.
  28. Free Press Unlimited. (2022). Exile Media: Mapping the challenges faced by independent media in exile. Retrieved from https://kq.freepressunlimited.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FPU_Exile-Media.pdf.
  29. Freedom House. (2022). Kazakhstan: Freedom on the Net 2022 country report. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/country/kazakhstan/freedom-net/2022.
  30. Gfoeller, T. (2025). What Russia’s war on Ukraine means for Central Asia. Retrieved from https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/what-russias-war-on-ukraine-means-for-central-asia/.
  31. Ghoshal, A. (2021). Mirroring the other: Refugee, homeland, identity and diaspora. In A.K. Sahoo (Ed.), Routledge handbook of Asian diaspora and development (pp. 147-158). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429352768-13.
  32. Gorokhovskaia, Y., Schenkkan, N., & Vaughan, G. (2023). Still not safe: Transnational repression in 2022. Washington, DC: Freedom House.
  33. Grossman, E. (2022). Media and policy making in the digital age. Annual Review of Political Science, 25, 443-461. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-103422.
  34. Güdük, A., & Desmet, E. (2022). Legal consciousness and migration: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Law in Context, 18(2), 213-228. doi: 10.1017/S1744552322000118.
  35. Heidenreich, T., & Eberl, J.M. (2021). Political elites’ migration discourses on social media. In J. Strömbäck, C.E. Meltzer, J.-M. Eberl, C. Schemer, & H.G. Boomgaarden (Eds.), Media and public attitudes toward migration in Europe (pp. 140-155). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003015055-11.
  36. Human Rights Watch. (2022). Kazakhstan: Protesters arbitrarily arrested, beaten. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/02/01/kazakhstan-protesters-arbitrarily-arrested-beaten.
  37. Hutter, S., & Kriesi, H. (2022). Politicising immigration in times of crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(2), 341-365. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853902.
  38. International Crisis Group. (2022). Behind the unrest in Kazakhstan. Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/central-asia/kazakhstan/behind-unrest-kazakhstan.
  39. International Organization for Migration. (2021). Mapping report of the Kyrgyz diaspora, compatriots and migrants abroad. Retrieved from https://publications.iom.int/books/mapping-report-kyrgyz-diaspora-compatriots-and-migrants-abroad.
  40. International Organization for Migration. (2023). IOM Strategy for Kyrgyzstan 2022-2025. Retrieved from https://kyrgyzstan.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl1321/files/documents/2023-06/iom-kyrgyzstan-country-strategy_final.pdf.
  41. International Organization for Migration. (2025). Migration governance indicators: Kazakhstan second profile. Retrieved from https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/pub2025-011-el-mgi-kazakhstan-second-profile_0.pdf.
  42. Karabchuk, T., Shomotova, A., & Muschert, G.W. (2023). The media landscape in three Central Asian countries and its impact on key social and behavioral dimensions in the region. In E. Turdubaeva & E. Papoutsaki (Eds.), Mapping the media and communication landscape of Central Asia: An anthology of emerging and contemporary issues (pp. 151-172). London: Lexington Books.
  43. Karassayev, G., Naimanbayev, B., Abenova, G., Karibayev, M., & Mukataeva, Z. (2024). Origin, life and traditions of the Kazakhs in Central Asia, and their influence on modern Kazakhstan. Critical Survey, 36(4), 46-58. doi: 10.3167/cs.2024.360405.
  44. Kemp, S. (2023). Digital 2023: Kazakhstan. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-kazakhstan.
  45. Koziura, K. (2025). Toward the transnational memory of Holodomor: The famine commemorative genre and the Ukrainian diaspora. Memory Studies, 18(1), 22-43. doi: 10.1177/17506980241247270.
  46. Kunanets, N., Filippova, N., Dobrovolska, V., & Kazimi, P. (2020). Biobibliographic data repository of documentary cultural heritage. In 2020 IEEE 15th international conference on computer sciences and information technologies (CSIT) (pp. 221-225). Zbarazh: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/CSIT49958.2020.9321944.
  47. Light, F. (2024). EU criticises Georgian foreign agent bill, Kremlin defends it. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eu-criticises-georgian-foreign-agent-bill-kremlin-defends-it-2024-04-04/.
  48. Maigari, M.A., & Shehu, K. (2025). Diasporic participation in homeland democratic processes: Democracy beyond border in the internet era. Journal of Religion, Local Politics, and Law, 1(1), 1-19. doi: 10.64595/jrlpl.130.
  49. Media Policy Institute. (2023). The “Azattyk” YouTube channel has been hacked. Retrieved from https://media.kg/news/youtube-kanal-azattyka-podvergsya-hakerskoj-atake/.
  50. Moldabekov, D. (2017). Turkestan under Soviet rule. Retrieved from https://vlast.kz/library/24869-turkestan-pod-vlastu-sovetov.html.
  51. Nanovsky, S., & Knox, C. (2024). Political stability in authoritarian regimes: The case of Central Asia. Central Asian Survey, 44(3), 346-369. doi: 10.1080/02634937.2024.2402067.
  52. Netherlands Helsinki Committee. (2024). Open letter: Civil society organisations call on President of the Kyrgyz Republic, Sadyr Japarov, to veto the draft law on “foreign representatives”. Retrieved from https://www.nhc.nl/open-letter-civil-society-organisations-call-on-president-of-the-kyrgyz-republic-sadyr-japarovto-veto-the-draft-law-on-foreign-representatives/.
  53. Nguyễn, S., Kuo, R., Reddi, M., Li, L., & Moran, R. (2022). Studying mis- and disinformation in Asian diasporic communities: The need for critical transnational research beyond anglocentrism. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 3(2). doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-95.
  54. Novikova, N., Diachenko, O., Tkachenko, A., Chorna, N., Chornyi, R., & Krylov, M. (2025). The application of artificial intelligence in facilitating analytical support for the operations of governmental institutions. In R.K. Hamdan (Ed.), Sustainable data management. Studies in Big Data (Vol. 171, pp. 171-182). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-83911-5_15.
  55. Ogunyemi, O. (2017). Representing conflict: Gatekeeping practices and framing devices of African diasporic press. In Media, diaspora and conflict (pp. 137-152). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56642-9_9.
  56. Ogunyemi, O. (2018). Diasporic news and journalism. In M. Powers (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. New York: Oxford Academic. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.800.
  57. Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP). (2024). Kyrgyz parliament adopts widely-criticized foreign agents’ law. Retrieved from https://www.occrp.org/en/news/kyrgyz-parliament-adopts-widely-criticized-foreign-agents-law.
  58. Porlezza, C., & Arafat, R. (2022). Promoting newsafety from the exile: The emergence of new journalistic roles in diaspora journalists’ networks. Journalism Practice, 16(9), 1867-1889. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2021.1925947.
  59. Putz, C. (2022). No, press freedoms have not improved in Central Asia. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2022/05/no-press-freedoms-have-not-improved-in-central-asia/.
  60. Rakhmatov, M. (2023). Political activity of Mustafa Shokay and Ahmed Zaki Validii in Turkestan. SPAST Reports, 1(5). doi: 10.69848/sreports.v1i5.4976.
  61. Reporters Without Borders. (2022). Independent media unable to cover protests in Kazakhstan. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/independent-media-unable-cover-protests-kazakhstan.
  62. Reuters. (2024). Kyrgyzstan parliament adopts Russian-style “foreign agents” bill. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/kyrgyzstan-parliament-adopts-russian-style-foreign-agents-bill-2024-03-14/.
  63. Saidіrakhman, U. (2025). “Yash Turkistan”: An alternative perspective against Soviet narratives. Bulletin of Eurasian Universities, 151(2), 176-196. doi: 10.32523/2616-7174-2025-151-2-176-196.
  64. Schläpfer, I., & Parkyn, R. (2024). Flight and fight. Supporting exiled media to survive and sustain. Washington, DC: Internews.
  65. Shokay.kz. (2025). A fiery publicist. Retrieved from https://shokay.kz/en/a-fiery-publicist/.
  66. Stronski, P., & Ng, N. (2018). Cooperation and competition: Russia and China in Central Asia, the Russian Far East, and the Arctic. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2018/02/28/cooperation-and-competition-russia-and-china-in-central-asia-russian-far-east-and-arctic-pub-75673.
  67. Sultanbayeva, G., Kulsariyeva, A., Lozhnikova, O., Kalibekuly, D., & Tolegen, B. (2025). Negative influence of incorrect information on Facebook user behaviour: Kazakhstan case. Rotura: Journal of Communication, Culture and Arts, 5(1), 37-54. doi: 10.34623/b000-jg37.
  68. Tsavkko Garcia, R. (2024). Diasporas and the role of social media on militant/political activities: The Basque diaspora in Argentina in the spotlight. Journal for Cultural and Media Policy, 9(1), 77-90. doi: 10.1386/cjmc.9.1.77_1.
  69. United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM). (2024). Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved from https://www.usagm.gov/networks/rferl/.
  70. Waldinger, R., & Shams, T. (2023). Cross-border politics: Diasporic mobilization and state response. Annual Review of Sociology, 49(1), 401-419. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-121720.
  71. Yesmaganbet, N., & Kairbekov, N. (2025). Examination of the activities of religious educators of the Soviet period in the context of the development of European religious thought. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(3), 1-15. doi: 10.46222/pharosjot.106.3030.
  72. Yu, S., & Parke, J. (2023). Research inquiries for digital diaspora and digital diasporic media. Journal of Global Diaspora & Media, 4, 79-96. doi: 10.1386/gdm_00035_1.
  73. Zeng, J., & Cheng, C.Y. (2025). Diasporic citizen journalism: Exploring the discussion on the 2022 blank paper protests in the Chinese Twitter community. Journalism, 26(5), 1047-1066. doi: 10.1177/14648849241250191.
  74. Zholmakhanova, A.B., Tuyakbaev, G.A., Abdrazakov, K., Oralova, G.S., & Serdali, B.K. (2018). Kazakh emigration and historical significance of memories of Mustafa Shokay. Revista Latino-Americana de Estudos sobre a Emigração, 23(82), 111-120. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1495807.

Suggested citation

Mukasheva, M., Bakenova, R., Alim, A., Nuraliev, N., & Akunov, A. (2026). Émigré media as a tool for transnational political influence: Communication mechanisms and models of elite responses in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Society. Document. Communication, 11(2), 116-135. https://doi.org/10.69587/sdc/2.2026.116