Article

Digital audiovisual practices as social communication technologies: Transformation of cultural narratives

Oleksandr Bezruchko, Hanna Chmil, Iryna Gavran, Volodymyr Mykhalov, Myroslava Chaika
Retrieved from Volume 11, No. 2, 2026 Pages 98–115
Received
23.11.2025
Revised
06.04.2026
Accepted
12.05.2026
Published
30.05.2026
Views
40

Abstract

The aim of the study was to identify the mechanisms and directions of transformation of cultural narratives in the digital environment and to determine the role of digital media in the formation of new forms of collective memory. An interdisciplinary approach was employed, combining methods of discursive analysis, structural-semantic modelling, and cultural hermeneutics to identify patterns of change in cultural narratives within the digital space. The study demonstrated that the category of the “cultural narrative” in contemporary humanities has ceased to be merely a narrative structure and has instead become a complex of meaning-producing practices that shape collective ways of interpreting the past, present, and future. An analysis of historiographical approaches showed that the narrative representation of history is an act of constructing meaning rather than reproducing facts, which determines the specificity of cultural discourses. A comparative analysis of classical and media-oriented theories revealed two main developmental tendencies: a shift from the grammar of storytelling to technologies of memory. In the digital age, cultural narratives acquire a modular, fragmentary, and multiple structure, giving rise to new modes of representing experience. It was determined that digital audiovisual practices influence narrative processes through three mechanisms – interactivity, visualisation, and algorithmisation – which transform the ways cultural meanings are produced and perceived. These mechanisms are considered key factors in the transformation of social communication practices under conditions of digitalisation, as they redefine the forms of interaction, circulation of meanings, and public engagement with cultural memory. In the Ukrainian context, digital initiatives in the field of cultural heritage, including the digitisation of museum collections and online archives, combine the functions of preservation and representation of national culture under conditions of war. This indicates the emergence of a new type of narrative – interactive, networked, and hybrid – combining local memory with global visibility. The digital transformation of cultural narratives has revealed both the potential for democratising access to culture and the risks of algorithmic inequality and loss of depth of content. Preserving cultural autonomy in the digital environment requires the integration of technological innovation with critical awareness and institutional support. The results of the study may be used in the development of strategies for digital humanities, cultural policy, social communication technologies, and programmes for the digital preservation of Ukraine’s cultural heritage

Keywords

References

  1. 80 percent of Ukrainian citizens use the Internet on a daily basis. (2024). Retrieved from https://mediacenter.org.ua/80-percent-of-ukrainian-citizens-use-the-internet-on-a-daily-basis/.
  2. Acim, Y. (2025). The impact of media on identity construction. Dibon Journal of Languages, 1(2), 165-173. doi: 10.64169/djl.28.
  3. Bellini, M. (2022). Interactive digital narratives as complex expressive means. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3, article number 854960. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2022.854960.
  4. Ben-David, A., Meyers, O., & Neiger, M. (2024). How social memory works on social media: A methodological framework. Memory, Mind & Media, 3, article number e20. doi: 10.1017/mem.2024.18.
  5. Cai, M., Zhu, Z., & Chen, Y. (2025). Design and expression of narrative and empathic effects in data-based videos. In M. Schrepp (Ed.), Design, user experience, and usability. HCII 2025. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 15796, pp. 177-189). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-93227-4_13.
  6. Chernetska, N. (2024). The war boosts digitising everything quickly: How Odesa museums preserve cultural heritage. Retrieved from https://intent.press/en/publications/recovery/2024/the-war-boosts-digitising-everything-quickly-how-odesa-museums-preserve-cultural-heritage/.
  7. Davymuka, S. (2025). Digitalization of art as an important forming trend new models of culture: A retrospective analysis. Ethnology Notebooks, 1(181), 95-109. doi: 10.15407/nz2025.01.095.
  8. De Kosnik, A. (2016). Rogue archives: Digital cultural memory and media fandom. Cambridge: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/10248.001.0001.
  9. Docudays UA. (2025). Interdisciplinary art programme Docudays UA. Retrieved from https://docudays.ua/eng/docusynthesis/.
  10. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (2024). DCMI metadata basics. Retrieved from https://www.dublincore.org/resources/metadata-basics/.
  11. Dubrovina, L., Kovtaniuk, Y., & Harahulia, S. (2025). Regulatory and legal framework, research, and prospects for artificial intelligence implementation in archival and library affairs in Ukraine: An analytical review. Science and Innovation, 21(5), 18-32. doi: 10.15407/scine21.05.018.
  12. Dyomin, M., Ivashko, Y., Ivashko, O., Kuśnierz, K., & Kuzmenko, T. (2021). Development trends and problems of large Ukrainian historical cities in the twentieth and twenty-first century: Case study of urban tendencies and problems of revitalization of an industrial district. Wiadomosci Konserwatorskie, 65, 26-36. doi: 10.48234/WK65TRENDS.
  13. Eiranen, R., Hatavara, M., Kivimäki, V., Mäkelä, M., & Toivo, R.M. (2022). Narrative and experience: Interdisciplinary methodologies between history and narratology. Scandinavian Journal of History, 47(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1080/03468755.2021.2019107.
  14. Europeana Pro. (2025). Metadata: Europeana data model. Retrieved from https://pro.europeana.eu/page/metadata.
  15. Harahulia, S.S. & Symonenko, T.V. (2025). Research support services in digital humanities: Approaches, technologies, tools. Manuscript and Book Heritage of Ukraine, 2, 189-203. doi: 10.15407/rksu.37.189.
  16. Hastuti, H., Maulana, H.F., Lawelai, H., & Suherman, A. (2025) Algorithmic influence and media legitimacy: A systematic review of social media’s impact on news production. Frontiers in Communication, 10, article number 1667471. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1667471.
  17. How do Ukrainians consume their news? Findings of a 2025 survey. (2025). Retrieved from https://ukraineworld.org/en/articles/analysis/ukrainians-consume-news-2025-survey.
  18. ICCROM. (2022). UNESCO and ICCROM join forces with the Maidan Museum of Kyiv to support Ukraine’s museums. Retrieved from https://www.iccrom.org/news/unesco-and-iccrom-join-forces-maidan-museum-kyiv-support-ukraine’s-museums.
  19. Ienciu, C.I. (2024). Hayden White and the value of narrativity in the representation of reality. In I. Boldea, C. Sigmirean & D.-M. Buda (Eds.), The power of dialogue in a globalized world (pp. 213-221). Tîrgu Mureș: Arhipelag XXI Press.
  20. International Council of Museums (ICOM). (2024). ICOM-SAREC project for Ukraine successfully completed. Retrieved from https://icom.museum/en/news/icom4ukraine-sarec-project-successfully-completed-support-of-ukrainian-museums/.
  21. Ivanytska, B., Stoliarchuk, N., Shostak, V., Moskvych, O., & Aleksandrova, M. (2024). Representation and diversity of Ukrainian culture in contemporary media: Impact, challenges and prospects. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6, article number e2024ss0225. doi: 10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0225.
  22. Ivashko, Y., Dmytrenko, A., Paprzyca, K., Krupa, M., & Kozłowski, T. (2020). Problems of historical cities heritage preservation: Chernihiv Art Nouveau buildings. International Journal of Conservation Science, 11(4), 953-964.
  23. Kemp, S. (2025). Digital 2025: Ukraine. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-ukraine.
  24. Kholod, O. (2023). Methodological principles of research of social communication processes. Social Communications: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 9-43. doi: 10.51423/2524-0471-2023-15-1-1.
  25. Koenitz, H. (2023). Understanding interactive digital narrative: Immersive expressions for a complex time. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003106425.
  26. Kot, S., Mozolevska, A., Polishchuk, O., & Stodolinska, Y. (2024). The discursive power of digital popular art during the Russo-Ukrainian war: Re/shaping visual narratives. Arts, 13(1), article number 38. doi: 10.3390/arts13010038.
  27. Kovalenko, Yu. (2025). Digital preservation of Ukrainian audiovisual heritage during wartime: Challenges and institutional practices. Culture Crossroads, 27, 73-86. doi: 10.55877/cc.vol27.534.
  28. Kravchuk, O., Serbina, N., Bozhkov, A., Serbina, K., & Tsyrfa, I. (2025). Interreligious relations in medieval Ukraine: Coexistence of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim communities. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(3), 1-13. doi: 10.46222/pharosjot.106.3031.
  29. Kulyk, V. (2011). The media, history and identity: Competing narratives of the past in the Ukrainian popular press. National Identities, 13(3), 287-303. doi: 10.1080/14608944.2011.591373.
  30. Manovich, L. (2002). The language of new media. Canadian Journal of Communication, 27(1). doi: 10.22230/cjc.2002v27n1a1280.
  31. Masood, D. (2024). Hayden White’s historical theory: A critical analysis. Pakistan Journal of American Studies, 42(1), 111-134.
  32. Media Literacy Index of Ukrainians: 2020-2024 fifth wave. (2025). Retrieved from https://en.detector.media/post/media-literacy-index-of-ukrainians-2020-2024-fifth-wave.
  33. Melnyk, R., Volkova, G., Hvozdetska, M., Bashmanivskyi, O., & Perederii, I. (2025). Digital transformation of cultural heritage: Prospects and threats. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(1), 1143-1168. doi: 10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.381.
  34. Metzler, H., & Garcia, D. (2023). Social drivers and algorithmic mechanisms on digital media. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(5), 735-748. doi: 10.1177/17456916231185057.
  35. Mystetskyi Arsenal presents a collection of electronic editions for the exhibitions, legal and free. (2025). Retrieved from https://artarsenal.in.ua/en/povidomlennya/mystetskyi-arsenal-presents-a-collection-of-electronic-editions-for-the-exhibitions-legal-and-free/.
  36. Nappi, M.L., Buono, M., Chivăran, C., & Giusto, R.M. (2024). Models and tools for the digital organisation of knowledge: Accessible and adaptive narratives for cultural heritage. Heritage Science, 12, article number 112. doi: 10.1186/s40494-024-01219-z.
  37. Norambuena, B.F.K., & Mitra, T. (2021). Narrative maps: An algorithmic approach to represent and extract information narratives. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4, article number 228. doi: 10.1145/3432927.
  38. Onyejelem, T.E., & Aondover, E.M. (2024). Digital generative multimedia tool theory (DGMTT): A theoretical postulation. Journalism and Mass Communication, 14(3), 189-204. doi: 10.17265/2160-6579/2024.03.004.
  39. Ovsiankina, L. (2019). Consolidating role of historical memory in formation the moral foundations of modern Ukrainian society. Skhid, 1(159), 49-54. doi: 10.21847/1728-9343.2019.1(159).157593.
  40. Paul, H. (2011). Hayden White: The making of a philosopher of history. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 5(1), 131-145. doi: 10.1163/187226311X555491.
  41. PinchukArtCentre. (2025). Educational programs & events. Retrieved from https://pinchukartcentre.org/en/educational-programs-events.
  42. Pletsan, K., Havryliuk, A., Poberezhets, H., Yurova, T., Bilov, V., & Polotnianko, O. (2023). Digital transformation of preservation and restoration of Ukraine’s cultural heritage. Studies in Media and Communication, 11(7), 376-383. doi: 10.11114/smc.v11i7.6514.
  43. Rodinova, N., Pylypchuk, N., Domashenko, S., Havrylyuk, I., & Androsovych, A. (2024). Ukrainian economy in the era of digital branding: Risks and opportunities. Futurity Economics & Law, 4(4), 4-24. doi: 10.57125/FEL.2024.12.25.01.
  44. Sakarang, S.F., Asli, M.F., & Hamzah, M. (2025). Narrative visualization: Taxonomy, methodologies, challenges, and opportunities. Information Visualization, 24(2), 199-223. doi: 10.1177/14738716251315916.
  45. Serbina, N.F., Tsyrfa, L.A., & Sapsai, A.P. (2022). Understanding Colombia-Ukraine relations: Modern developments and a global perspective. Journal of Community Positive Practices, SI, 141-162. doi: 10.35782/JCPP.2022.SI.11.
  46. Shao, Z., Shen, L., Li, H., Shan, Y., Qu, H., Wang, Y., & Chen, S. (2025). Narrative player: Reviving data narratives with visuals. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 31(10), 6781-6795. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2025.3530512.
  47. Siliutina, I., Tytar, O., Barbash, M., Petrenko, N., & Yepyk, L. (2024). Cultural preservation and digital heritage: Challenges and opportunities. Amazonia Investiga, 13(75), 262-273. doi: 10.34069/AI/2024.75.03.22.
  48. Sydorenko, A., Chibalashvili, A., Shalinskyi, I., Berdynskikh, S., & Mazur, V. (2023). Ukrainian digital art during the full-scale Russian-Ukrainian war. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 13(2), 125-130. doi: 10.33543/j.130237.125130.
  49. Takala, G.B. (2023). The interactive creativity of the digital era: Exploring how media art redefines the relationship between audience and artwork. Studies in Art and Architecture, 2(3), 28-44.
  50. Trach, Yu. (2025). Archiving virtual culture: Problems, challenges and preservation strategies. Culture and Arts in the Modern World, 26, 34-47. doi: 10.31866/2410-1915.26.2025.340292.
  51. Tukhtarova, A.S., Issakova, S.S., Kussaiynova, Z.A., Kenzhemuratova, S.K., & Nassyritdinova, A.N. (2021). Linguocultural approach to audiovisual translation on the example of “game of thrones”. International Journal of Society Culture and Language, 9(3), 49-63.
  52. Ukrainian Biennale of Digital and New Media Art (Ubiennale). (2025). Retrieved from https://ubiennale.com/2025.
  53. Ukrainian Heritage Monitoring Lab. (2025). Our work. Retrieved from https://www.hemo.in.ua/digitization-en#services.
  54. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2024). Action plan for culture in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://articles.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2024/09/UNESCO%20Action%20Plan%20Culture%20for%20Ukraine%20Recovery%202024.pdf.
  55. Vitov, A., & Tymofieieva, H. (2025). Collective memory in Ukraine as a factor in identity formation in the context of postmodernity. Skhid, 7(2), 43-48. doi: 10.21847/2411-3093.2025.726.
  56. White, H. (1984). The question of narrative in contemporary historical theory. History and Theory, 23(1), 1-33. doi: 10.2307/2504969.
  57. Wojciechowski, B. (2024). Narrative and narrative identity. In Narrative identity as a condition for authentic legal subjectivity (pp. 33-69). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-74939-1_3.
  58. Yasseri, T., Gildersleve, P., & David, L. (2022). Collective memory in the digital age. Progress in Brain Research, 274(1), 203-226. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2022.07.001.
  59. Yusifova, G.Y., & Kazimi, P.F. (2025). Logical social similarities and imitation (Phenomenon influencing human thinking). Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(4), 2189-2195. doi: 10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6505.
  60. Zaitseva, S., Dobrodum, O., Yenin, M., & Isazade, N. (2025). Digital war narratives and media practices within the Ukrainian media field. Proceedings of Azerbaijan High Technical Educational Institutions Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5315716.

Suggested citation

Bezruchko, O., Chmil, H., Gavran, I., Mykhalov, V., & Chaika, M. (2026). Digital audiovisual practices as social communication technologies: Transformation of cultural narratives. Society. Document. Communication, 11(2), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.69587/sdc/2.2026.98