Abstract
The research relevance is determined by the growing role of Scopus and Web of Science as key tools for evaluation of scientific activities and the need to optimise the processes of forming collections and determining the subject areas of scientific journals to increase visibility and influence in the global scientific space. The study aimed to analyse the peculiarities of forming collections and determining the subject areas of scientific journals indexed in the international scientometric databases Scopus and Web of Science. Research methods included analysis and synthesis, systematisation and generalisation of data, as well as content analysis of scientometric databases Scopus and Web of Science, used to identify the specifics of the formation of collections and subject areas of scientific periodicals. The criteria for the selection of periodicals, the structure of subject areas and the specifics of the formation of collections in Web of Science were addressed. Differences in approaches to the classification of scientific journals by subject areas were analySed, and the impact of these differences on the representativeness of scientific research in various fields of knowledge was investigated. The main trends in the development of collections and subject areas of scientific journals in the context of modern requirements for scientometric indicators and international standards of scientific communication were identified. The study demonstrated that the Scopus and Web of Science databases have different approaches to classifying subject areas. The study determined that Scopus is characterised by a wider coverage of journals, especially in the social and medical sciences, while Web of Science emphasises journals with a high impact factor. The classification of subject areas is also different, which should be accounted fur during search and analysis of scientific sources. The practical significance of the study is determined by empirically grounded data on the formation of journal collections and subject areas in Scopus and Web of Science, which will contribute to optimisation of publication strategies, increasing research visibility, and improving the evaluation of scientific contribution, therefore beneficial for researchers and postgraduate students
Keywords
classification; research; publications; impact factor; scientific communication
References
- Arts & Humanities Citation Index. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/academia-government/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-referencing/web-of-science/web-of-science-core-collection/arts-humanities-citation-index/.
- Book Citation Index. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/academia-government/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-referencing/web-of-science/web-of-science-core-collection/book-citation-index/.
- Bornmann, L., Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently-cited papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1507-1513. doi: 10.1002/asi.23333.
- Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Khedri, M., & Jafari-Marandi, P. (2013). A Comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18-26. doi: 10.5539/ass.v9n5p18.
- Clarivate. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/.
- Collection List Downloads. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://mjl.clarivate.com/collection-list-downloads.
- Conference Proceedings Citation Index. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/academia-government/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-referencing/web-of-science/web-of-science-core-collection/conference-proceedings-citation-index/.
- Emerging Sources Citation Index. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/academia-government/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-referencing/web-of-science/web-of-science-core-collection/emerging-sources-citation-index/.
- Ghanadinezhad, F., Osareh, F., & Ghane, M. (2023). Approaches and methods for predicting the trend of scientific outputs: A scoping review. Scientometrics Research Journal, 9 (1), 341-386. doi: 10.22070/rsci.2022.14777.1515.
- Herzog, C., Hook, D., & Konkiel, S. (2020). Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 387-395. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00020.
- Liu, W., Zhu, J., Zuo, C., & Wang, H. (2019). Is it suitable for a journal to bid for publishing a review that is likely to be highly cited? Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), 647-649. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0016-y.
- MacRoberts, M., & MacRoberts, B. (2018). The mismeasure of science: Citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(3), 474-482. doi: 10.1002/asi.23970.
- Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), 1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002.
- Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis, Scientometrics, 106, 213-228. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
- Moral-Muñoz, J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional De La Información, 29(1). doi: 10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03.
- Piltiai, S., Zabegalov, I., & Bulashenko, A. (2021). Publication of scientific articles in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Education, Science and Production: Development and Prospects, 251-254. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/eyvus.
- Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1). doi: 10.3390/publications9010012.
- Ravenscroft, J., Liakata, M., Clare, A., & Duma, D. (2017). Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements. PLoS ONE, 12, article number e0173152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173152.
- Science Citation Index Expanded. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/academia-government/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-referencing/web-of-science/web-of-science-core-collection/science-citation-index-expanded/.
- Scopus Content. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus/content.
- Scopus. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/how-scopus-works/content.
- Selemani, A., Wella, K., Chen, Y., Vicente-Crespo, M., & Uthman, O. (2023). A scientometric analysis of Africa’s health science journals indexed in international and regional databases: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Public Health, 68, article number 1606415. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606415.
- Singh, V., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126, 5113-5142. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5.
- Social Sciences Citation Index. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/academia-government/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-referencing/web-of-science/web-of-science-core-collection/social-sciences-citation-index/.
- Sych, T., Boniak, V., Dokuchaieva, V., Khrykov, Y., & Vasynova, N. (2020). Publication of education management research in Ukrainian issues from Scopus and Web of Science bases. Asia Life Sciences, 22 (2), 127-142.
- Tapullima-Mori, C., Mamani-Benito, O., Turpo-Chaparro, J., Olivas-Ugarte, L., & Carranza-Esteban, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence in university education: A bibliometric review in Scopus and Web of Science. Revista Electrónica Educare, 28(S), 1-21. doi: 10.15359/ree.28-S.18489.
- Tennant, J. (2020). Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/qhvgr.
- Visser, M., Jan Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-Scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20-41. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00112.
- Vysochan, O., Hyk, V., Vysochan, O., & Olshanska, M. (2021). Sustainability accounting: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Quality – Access to Success, 22(185), 95-102. doi: 10.47750/QAS/22.185.14.
- Web of Science. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/.
- Which Clarivate products do you have access to? (n.d.). Retrieved from https://clarivate.libguides.com/authors/welcome.
- Williams, R., & Bornmann, L. (2016). Sampling issues in bibliometric analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1225-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.004.