Article

Falsification of securities in Russian empire

Andrii Boiko-Gagarin
Retrieved from Volume 5, No. 1, 2020 Pages 11–26
Views
247

Abstract

The problem of counterfeit money manufacturing throughout the history has been acute for any world state. In addition to the intruders money, other tangible assets were attracted– securities, all kinds of documents that gave fashion the opportunity to illegally use tangible goods, property or to receive services without monetary costs. Counterfeits were subject to a variety of documents and securities that could make life easier or to make a profit for individuals. In the criminal cases of the State Historical Archives, evidence of the forgery of promissory notes, government bonds, stocks and bond coupons, as well as postage stamps whose illegal manufacture was equivalent to counterfeiting was retained. On the territory of Ukraine, there have been cases of falsification of: winning tickets of the 1st domestic state loan, «Freedom Loan» bonds coupons, counterfeit shares of the Putilovsky Factory’s Society, coupons of the Moscow Credit Society, Kiev Land Bank. In 1912, rumors of counterfeiting coupons of 4½% of Kharkiv Land Bank mortgage coupons were reported on newspaper counters throughout the Russian Empire. Fake securities were no less popular than making counterfeit money. Technologically, the degree of complexity was even less, and the potential amounts that could be obtained from counterfeit bills sometimes reached impressive levels, as documented in the sources

Keywords

References

  1. Bezpalko, V. V. (2016) Vekselni zoboviazannia v hroshovomu oboroti Volyni druhoi polovyny XVI st. [Bills in the monetary circulation of Volyn in the second half of the XVI century.]. Abstract of ppers: Aktualni problemy numizmatyky u systemi spetsialnykh haluzei istorychnoi nauky. pp. 58-61 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Boiko-Haharin,  A. S. (2020)  Profesiina  prynalezhnist falshyvomonetnykiv v ser. XIX – poch. XX st. [The professional identity of the money counterfeiters in the middle of the XIX cent. – the beginning of the XX cent.]. Chasopys ukrainskoi istorii. (41). 6977. DOI: 94.10347/2522-4111.2020.41.1.9 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Bojko-Gagarin, A. S. (2017) Fal’sifikacija monet i banknot v Pol’she do 1917 goda po materialam ukrainskoj gazetnoj periodiki [Falsification of coins and banknotes in Poland until 1917 according to the materials of the Ukrainian newspaper periodicals]. Abstract of papers: Forum Numizmatyczne, Pieniadz I Mennice (pp. 103109). Bialystok [in Russian].
  4. Bojko-Gagarin, A. S. (2017) Polovina matricy fal’shivomonetchika dlja poddelki rublja Nikolaja ІІ Romanova [Half of the counterfeit matrix for the forgery of the ruble by Nikolai II Romanov]. Bankaўskі vesnіk, 12 (653, 57-58 [in Russian].
  5. Kotsur, V. P. & Boiko-Gagarin, A. S. (2019) Napoleon russian  forged assignations in Naddniprianshchyna (over Dnipro land). East European historical bulletin (11). 66-77 [in English].
  6. Orlyk, S. V. & Boiko-Haharin, A.S. (2017) Falshyvomonetnytstvo v Ukraini v roky Pershoi svitovoi viiny [The money counterfeit during the WWI]. Ukrainskyi numizmatychnyi shchorichnyk (1). 143-164 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Orlyk, V. (2006). Yehor Kankrin i fiskalna polityka Rosiiskoi imperii v Pravoberezhnii Ukraini v druhii chverti XIX st. [Yegor Kankrin and the fiscal policy of the Russian Empire in Right-Bank Ukraine in the second quarter of the nineteenth century]. Spetsialni istorychni dystsypliny:pytannia teorii ta metodyky [Special Historical Disciplines: Theory and Methodology]. 13. Nats. akad. nauk Ukrainy, In-t istorii Ukrainy. 97-110 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Orlyk, V. M. (2004) Problemy istorii podatkovoi polityky Rosiiskoi imperii v ukrainskomu seli kintsia XVIII – pochatku XX st. v “ahrarnii” istoriohrafii. [The problems of the history of the tax policy of the Russian empire in the Ukrainian suburb in the end of the XVIII – the beginning of the XX cent in the “agricultural” historiography]. Istoriia Ukrainy. Malovidomi imena, podii, fakty. [The history of Ukraine. Unknown names, events and facts] (27). 224-239 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Orlyk,  V.  M.  (2010).  Dozhovtneva  finansovo-pravova literatura yak dzherelo do vyvchennia problem finansovoi polityky uriadu Rosiiskoi imperii kintsia XVIII pochatku XX st. [The Prerevolutionary financial and legal literature as a source for studying the problems of the financial policy of the government of the Russian Empire in the late18th early 20th century]. Istoriia nauky i biohrafistyka [History of Science and Biografistica] (2) [in Ukrainian].
  10. Orlyk, V. M. (2011) Derzhavni finansy Rosiiskoi imperii pershoi polovyny XIX st.: stan ta osnovni tendentsii. [The state finances if the Russian Empire in the first half of the XIX cent.: the current state and perspectives]. Naukovyi visnyk Izmailskoho derzhavnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. [The scientific bulletin of the Izmail state humanity unevirsity]. (30). 96-108. Izmail [in Ukrainian].
  11. Orlyk, V. M. (2011) Fondy ministerstva finansiv u Rosiiskomu derzhavnomu istorychnomu arkhivi. [The funds of the Ministry of Finance in the Russian state historical archives]. Studii z dokumentoznavstva, arkhivoznavstva ta spetsialnykh haluzei istorychnoi nauky. [The documentological, archival studies and the special branches of the historian csience] (1). 98-110 [in Ukrainian].
  12. Orlyk, V. M. (2011). Do pytannia metodolohii doslidzhen problem ekonomichnoi istorii Rosiiskoi imperii [On the question of the methodology of research on the problems of the economic history ofthe Russian Empire]. Problemy istorii Ukrainy XIX pochatku XX st.[The problems of the History of Ukraine of the 19th and early 20th centuries]. 18. 59-64 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Riabchenko, P. (2003) Veksel. [The bill]. Spetsialni istorychni dystsypliny: pytannia teorii ta metodyky (10). Vol. 1. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Suggested citation

Boiko-Gagarin, A. (2020). Falsification of securities in Russian empire. Society. Document. Communication, 5(1), 11-26.