Abstract
This study aimed to examine the historical development of archival affairs and compare the specific features of its evolution in countries with well-established archival traditions, such as the USA, France, Germany, and Ukraine. Another key aspect of the research is the analysis of the structure and principles governing the functioning of archives, both in Ukraine and in other countries where archival science forms an integral part of historical scholarship. The development of archival science has been assessed, highlighting both its strengths and weaknesses. The study explored the history of archival affairs across different countries through the lens of comparative analysis, focusing on organisational structures and working methods. Additionally, it examines how historical, cultural, and socio-political contexts have influenced the development of archival institutions in various regions worldwide. Particular attention was given to ancient civilisations, such as Egypt, Mesopotamia, and the Roman Empire, where archives served as repositories for important documents and administrative records. Furthermore, changes in archival operations during the Industrial Revolution and colonial expansion, which influenced the development of modern archival systems in Latin America, Africa, and Asia, have been analysed. Contemporary trends in archival studies, such as digitisation and the globalisation of archival practices, as well as the challenges faced by archivists in different countries, are examined. A comparative analysis revealed that, despite significant differences in the structure and organisation of archives, a common objective is the preservation of documentary heritage and the provision of access to archival resources. This comparative approach highlighted both shared and distinctive aspects of archival development
Keywords
archival science; document collections; sources; collections; registers
References
[1] Blouin Jr., F.X. (2019). Epilogue: A perspective on the archival divide. Coimbra: Coimbra University Press. doi: 10.14195/978-989-26-1794-7_23.
[2] Blouin Jr., F.X. (2021). All shook up: The archival legacy of Terry Cook. The American Archivist, 84(1), 207-209. doi: 10.17723/0360-9081-84.1.207.
[3] Burak, G., Rothman, E.N., & Ferguson, H. (2022). Toward early modern archivality: The perils of history in the age of neo-eurocentrism. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 64(3), 541-575. doi: 10.1017/S0010417522000196.
[4] Burr, G.L. (1902). European archives. The American historical review (Vol VII). Retrieved from https://archive.org/ details/europeanarchives00burrrich.
[5] Caswell, M.L. (2017). Inventing new archival imaginaries: Theoretical foundations for identity-based community archives. In Identity Palimpsests: Ethnic Archiving in the U.S. and Canada (pp. 35-58). Sacramento: Litvin Books.
[6] Central State Historical Archives of Ukraine. (2024). Retrieved from https://cdiak.archives.gov.ua/.
[7] Colavizza, G. Blanke, T., Jeurgens, Ch., & Noordegraaf, J. (2021). Archives and AI: An overview of current debates and future perspectives. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH), 15(1), article number 4. doi: 10.1145/3479010.
[8] Cook, T. (2006). An archival revolution: W. Kaye Lamb and the transformation of the archival profession. Archivaria, 60, 185-234.
[9] De Vivo, F., Guidi, A., & Silvestri, A. (2016). Archival transformations in early modern European history. European History Quarterly, 46(3), 421-434.
[10] Delsalle, P., & Procter, M. (2017). A history of archival practice. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315564821.
[11] Donnelly, M., & Norton, C. (2020). Doing history. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003107781.
[12] Dorado, S., & Mena, M. (2009). Evolution of the archive science. ACIMED, 20(1), 1-16.
[13] Dumanskyi, N. (2023). Working with library and archive funds, search and collection of scientific information. Library Science. Record Studies. Informology, 19(4), 63-68. doi: 10.32461/2409-9805.4.2023.294075.
[14] Ebrahimi, S.H., & Milford, I. (2022). Roundtable: The archives of global history in a time of international immobility. Historical Research, 95(270), 586-597. doi: 10.1093/hisres/htac015.
[15] Guardado da Silva, С. (2020). The place of ‘Personal Archives’ in the International Archival Science/Discipline. The Bulletin of the Archive of the University of Coimbra, 33(2), 95-108. doi: 10.14195/2182-7974_33-2_4.
[16] Hedstrom, M. (1995). Electronic archives: Integrity and access in the network environment. The American Archivist, 58(3), 312-324. doi: 10.17723/aarc.58.3.n7353726666u41v5.
[17] Ivanushchenko, H. (2011). The archival revolution in Ukraine as a social phenomenon of the early twenty-first century. Worldview-Philosophy-Religion, 1(1), 239-245.
[18] Kalogeropoulos, K., Vassilikou, D., & Tiverios, M. (2021). Sidelights on Greek antiquity: Archaeological and epigraphical essays in honour of Vasileios Petrakos. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110699326-202.
[19] Kenosi, L., & Moathodi, T. (2012). The determination of value in archival science and the ever evolving theories of records selection. Eastern Librarian, 23(1), 24-36. doi: 10.3329/el.v23i1.12116.
[20] Klasinc, P.P. (2019). Archival science – today. Atlanti, 29(1), 10-18. doi: 10.33700/2670-4579.29.1.10-18(2019).
[21] Klinken, G. (2019). Endangered; When newspaper archives crumble, history dies. Wacana, Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, 20(1), article number 1. doi: 10.17510/wacana.v20i1.733.
[22] Marsh, D.E. Andre, S.St., Wagner, T., & Bell, J.A. (2023). Attitudes and uses of archival materials among science-based anthropologists. Archival Science, 23, 355-379. doi: 10.1007/s10502-023-09411-z.
[23] Müller, P. (2013). Archives and history: Towards a history of ‘the use of state archives’ in the 19th century. History of the Human Sciences, 26(4), 27-49. doi: 10.1177/0952695113502483.
[24] Muller, S., Feith, J.A., & Fruin, R. (1920). Manual for organising and describing archives: Designed on behalf of the Vereeniging van Archivarissen in Nederland. Retrieved from https://resolver.kb.nl/ resolve?urn=MMKB02B:000000165:00005.
[25] Oegg, J.A. (1804). Ideas for a theory of archival science. Retrieved from https://www.digitalesammlungen.de/ view/bsb10726145?page=%2C1.
[26] Punzalan, R.L. (2023). Archives and the digital world. Archival Science, 23, 3-5. doi: 10.1007/s10502-022-09400-8.
[27] Rumschöttel, H. (2001). The development of archival science as a scholarly discipline. Archival Science, 1, 143-155. doi: 10.1007/BF02435645.
[28] Rydén, R. (2023). National archives, national memory? How national archives describe themselves and their mission. Archival Science, 23, 297-326. doi: 10.1007/s10502-023-09409-7.
[29] The National Archives UK. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/.
[30] The National Archives USA. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/.
[31] Tognoli, N.B., & Guimarães J. (2018). Postmodern archival science and contemporary diplomatics: New approaches for archival knowledge organization. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117663.
[32] Vernik, O., & Vernik, Yu. (2022). Ukrainian national biographical archive as a tool and material in ethno-psychological research. Library Science. Record Studies. Informology, 2022(4), 17-24. doi: 10.32461/24099805.4.2022.269775.
[33] Wadhwani, R.D., Suddaby, R., Mordhorst, M., & Popp, A. (2018). History as organizing: Uses of the past in organization studies. Organization Studies, 39(12), 1663-1683. doi: 10.1177/0170840618814867.
[34] Yale, E. (2016). Introduction: Consider the archive. Isis, 107(1), 74-76. doi: 10.1086/686076.
[35] Yekelchyk, S. (2007). Ukraine birth of a modern nation. New York, NY: Oxford Academic. doi: 10.1093/ oso/9780195305463.001.0001.
