Abstract
The aim of the study was to identify trends in the operation of political memes across various sociopolitical contexts and to ascertain their impact on the formation of public perceptions during election campaigns. To investigate the structure, tone, and dissemination of political memes across four electoral campaigns (United States 2016, Brazil 2018, Ukraine 2019, and India 2019), the methodological framework combined corpus and network analysis. This approach enabled the tracing of variations across platforms and types of digital interaction. The results demonstrate that political memes are complex visual-textual units that inform, affect, mobilise, discredit, and signal political belonging. Their dominant functions vary according to political context, platform architecture, and audience structure: emotional and discrediting memes intensified polarisation and reinforced candidate-related frames in the US; mobilisational and informational memes facilitated the construction of a “new” anti-system candidate and encouraged youth engagement in Ukraine; and WhatsApp-based memes supported targeted mobilization in Brazil. The findings further reveal that open platforms, such as X, Reddit, Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok, increase visibility, virality, and agenda-setting. Conversely, closed or semi-closed channels, like WhatsApp and Telegram, enhance group-based trust and targeted dissemination while reducing transparency and external verification. The study concludes that the influence of political memes depends on informational compression, emotional resonance, and identificational signalling, rather than any single communicative function. Ultimately, political memes represent an independent form of digital political communication capable of influencing public opinion through interaction with user communities, platform algorithms, and content. These findings have practical implications for media literacy initiatives, platform regulation, electoral communication analysis, and the development of rapid visual fact-checking techniques tailored to modern digital campaigns
Keywords
social media; digital communication; voter; campaign; mobilisation
References
- Al Afnan, M.A. (2025). The role of memes in shaping political discourse on social media. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(2), 1-10. doi: 10.11114/smc.v13i2.7482.
- Anderau, G., & Barbarrusa, D. (2024). The function of memes in political discourse. Topoi, 43, 1529-1546. doi: 10.1007/s11245-024-10112-0.
- Bülow, L., & Johann, M. (2023). Effects and perception of multimodal recontextualization in political Internet memes: Evidence from two online experiments in Austria. Frontiers in Communication, 7, article number 1027014. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.1027014.
- Carey, J.W. (2008). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203928912.
- Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444319514.
- Chagas, V., Freire, F., Rios, D., & Magalhães, D. (2019). The political memes and the politics of memes: A methodological proposal for content analysis of online political memes. First Monday, 24(2). doi: 10.5210/fm.v24i2.7264.
- Cruz, F.B., Valente, M.H., & Zanatta, R.A.F. (2019). Secrets and lies: WhatsApp and social media in Brazil’s 2018 presidential election (CELE Research Paper No. 36). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5152001.
- Davison, P. (2020). The language of internet memes. In M. Mandiberg (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 120-136). New York: New York University Press. doi: 10.18574/nyu/9780814763025.003.0013.
- Foreman-Braunschweig, K. (2025). “Kamala is brat”: Effects and perceptions of political memes among Generation Z audiences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
- Goodrich, T. (2019). Facebook memes during 2016 presidential election differed from gender stereotypes, study finds. Retrieved from https://news.web.baylor.edu/news/story/2019/facebook-memes-during-2016-presidential-election-differed-gender-stereotypes-study.
- Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Halversen, A., & Weeks, B.E. (2023). Memeing politics: Understanding political meme creators, audiences, and consequences on social media. Social Media + Society, 9(4). doi: 10.1177/20563051231205588.
- Heiskanen, B. (2017). Meme-ing electoral participation. European Journal of American Studies, 12(2). doi: 10.4000/ejas.12158.
- Huszár, F., Ktena, S.I., O’Brien, C., Belli, L., Schlaikjer, A., & Hardt, M. (2022). Algorithmic amplification of politics on Twitter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(1), article number e2025334119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2025334119.
- Johann, M. (2022). Political participation in transition: Internet memes as a form of political expression in social media. Studies in Communication Sciences, 22(1), 149-164. doi: 10.24434/j.scoms.2022.01.3005.
- Kamath, C., & Alur, S. (2025). Internet memes and social media marketing: A review of theories. Online Information Review, 49(2), 225-245. doi: 10.1108/OIR-11-2023-0584.
- Machado, C.C.V., Kira, B., Narayanan, V., & Kollanyi, B. (2019). A study of misinformation in WhatsApp groups with a focus on the Brazilian presidential elections. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 World wide web conference (pp. 1013-1019). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/3308560.3316738.
- Matias, N.A.G., Bartolome, P.H.D., Carreon, S.L.R., Tallara, F.M.L., & Villarama, J.A. (2024). Meme-ingful actions: Uncovering the influence of political memes on leadership performance and values formation. Language, Technology, and Social Media, 2(2), 204-219. doi: 10.70211/ltsm.v2i2.141.
- McKelvey, F., DeJong, S., & Frenzel, J. (2023). Memes, scenes and #ELXN2019s: How partisans make memes during elections. New Media & Society, 25(7), 1626-1647. doi: 10.1177/14614448211020690.
- McLuhan, M. (2001). Understanding media: The extensions of man. London: Routledge.
- Metzler, H., & Garcia, D. (2024). Social drivers and algorithmic mechanisms on digital media. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(5), 735-748. doi: 10.1177/17456916231185057.
- Misra, P. (2024). The role of memes in political discourse and public opinion formation: A study. International Journal of Cultural Studies and Social Sciences, 20(23), 101-108.
- Moody-Ramirez, M., & Church, A.B. (2019). Analysis of Facebook meme groups used during the 2016 US presidential election. Social Media + Society, 5(1). doi: 10.1177/2056305118808799.
- Mortensen, M., & Neumayer, C. (2021). The playful politics of memes. Information, Communication & Society, 24(16), 2367-2377. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2021.1979622.
- Mukhtar, S., Ayyaz, Q.U.A., Khan, S., Bhopali, A.M.N., Sajid, M.K.M., & Babbar, A.W. (2024). Memes in the digital age: A sociolinguistic examination of cultural expressions and communicative practices across border. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 1443-1455. doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i6.5520.
- Owen, L.H. (2016). Nearly half of Reddit users go there for 2016 election info. Retrieved from https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/02/nearly-half-of-reddit-users-go-there-for-2016-election-info/.
- Pascual-Ferrá, P., Alperstein, N., Barnett, D.J., & Rimal, R.N. (2025). Social media memes and early public opinion formation regarding highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) as a public health threat in the United States. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 19, article number e9. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2024.340.
- Peng, R.X., & Chen, J. (2025). Meme-ingful connections: Unleashing the power of memes, GIFs, and emojis in relationship-oriented online communication. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 19(4), article number 11. doi: 10.5817/CP2025-4-11.
- Pew Research Center. (2025). Social media and news fact sheet. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/social-media-and-news-fact-sheet/.
- Pidkuimukha, L., & Kiss, N. (2020). Battle of narratives: Political memes during the 2019 Ukrainian presidential election. Cognitive Studies, 20, article number 2246. doi: 10.11649/cs.2246.
- Reis, J.C.S., Melo, P.F., Garimella, K., Almeida, J.M., Eckles, D., & Benevenuto, F. (2020). A dataset of fact-checked images shared on WhatsApp during the Brazilian and Indian elections. arXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2005.02443.
- Rose, J., & MacGregor, O. (2021). The architecture of algorithm-driven persuasion. Journal of Information Architecture, 6(1), 17-33. doi: 10.55135/1015060901/211.009/2.037.
- Saccomanno, P. (2025). The emerging market of meme-news: How political Internet memes inform young adults and shape their political opinions. (PhD dissertation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy). doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35234.70084.
- Semotiuk, O., & Shevchenko, V. (2023). Making fun of power: Political cartoons and memes about President Zelensky. Quantitative and qualitative analysis. The European Journal of Humour Research, 10(4), 82-98. doi: 10.7592/EJHR.2022.10.4.703.
- Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Smith, A.O., & Hemsley, J. (2022). Memetics as informational difference: Offering an information-centric conception of memes. Journal of Documentation, 78(5), 1149-1163. doi: 10.1108/JD-07-2021-0140.
- Tulloch, B.J. (2023). Memes to an end: Why Internet memes matter to information research. Libri, 73(4), 293-305. doi: 10.1515/libri-2021-0098.
- Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
- Woolley, S.C., & Howard, P.N. (2017). Computational propaganda worldwide: Executive summary. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
- Zamora Medina, R., Gómez García, S., & Martínez Martínez, H. (2021). Political memes as an online persuasive resource: Analysis of its impact during 2019 electoral debates in Spain. Public Opinion, 27(2). doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19923486.