The purpose of the study was to reconstruct T. Ash’s views on the causes, nature, and consequences of the full-scale Russian-Ukrainian war, including Russia’s genocidal policy and war crimes, as well as the war’s prospects for Ukraine, Europe, Russia, and the world at large. The research methodology encompassed the principles of historicism, scholarly rigour, and authorial objectivity, alongside general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, and generalisation) and specialised historical methods (historico-genetic, historico-systemic, historico-analytical, critical-interpretive, problem-chronological, and retrospective). The study found that T. Ash consistently rejects explanations of the war through the lens of a “NATO threat”, interpreting it instead as a consequence of V. Putin’s imperial obsession with Ukraine, the Kremlin’s unwillingness to recognise Ukrainian statehood, and its fear of Ukraine’s democratic choice. It was demonstrated that the commentator characterises the war as existential for Ukraine, colonial in Russia’s intentions, and systemic in its international consequences. The study established that in T. Ash’s writing, war crimes appear not as incidental excesses of war but as elements of a deliberate strategy of terror, coercion, and the destruction of Ukrainian society. It was further shown that the expert directly applies the concept of a “genocidal campaign” to Russia’s actions, linking it to the denial of Ukraine’s right to exist, strikes against the civilian population, and attempts to render the normal functioning of the state impossible. It was separately determined that in T. Ash’s forecasts, the war will have long-term transformative consequences: for Ukraine – in the form of military and state consolidation; for Europe – in the form of a new security architecture; for Russia – in the form of strategic weakening; and for the world – as a test of democracies’ capacity to resist revisionist autocracy

war crimes; genocide; imperialism; expansion; historiography